Whether the Divine Person assumed a man?

❌ Objection 1 : It would seem that the Divine Person assumed a man. For it is written (Ps. 64:5): "Blessed is he whom Thou hast chosen and taken to Thee," which a gloss expounds of Christ; and Augustine says (De Agone Christ. xi): "The Son of God assumed a man, and in him bore things human."

❌ Objection 2 : Further, the word "man" signifies a human nature. But the Son of God assumed a human nature. Therefore He assumed a man.

❌ Objection 3 : Further, the Son of God is a man. But He is not one of the men He did not assume, for with equal reason He would be Peter or any other man. Therefore He is the man whom He assumed.