Whether prudence takes cognizance of singulars?
Objections
❌ Objection 1 : It would seem that prudence does not take cognizance of singulars. For prudence is in the reason, as stated above (Articles [1],2). But "reason deals with universals," according to Phys. i, 5. Therefore prudence does not take cognizance except of universals.
❌ Objection 2 : Further, singulars are infinite in number. But the reason cannot comprehend an infinite number of things. Therefore prudence which is right reason, is not about singulars.
❌ Objection 3 : Further, particulars are known by the senses. But prudence is not in a sense, for many persons who have keen outward senses are devoid of prudence. Therefore prudence does not take cognizance of singulars.