Whether anger requires an act of reason?
Objections
❌ Objection 1 : It would seem that anger does not require an act of reason. For, since anger is a passion, it is in the sensitive appetite. But the sensitive appetite follows an apprehension, not of reason, but of the sensitive faculty. Therefore anger does not require an act of reason.
❌ Objection 2 : Further, dumb animals are devoid of reason: and yet they are seen to be angry. Therefore anger does not require an act of reason.
❌ Objection 3 : Further, drunkenness fetters the reason; whereas it is conducive to anger. Therefore anger does not require an act of reason.